New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
Blog Article
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon because of the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified via the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Reasonable grounds are offered over the record to connect the petitioner with the commission in the alleged offence. Although punishment of your alleged offence does not slide from the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. but discovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is inside the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls while in the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, direction continues to be sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that though contemplating the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the advantage of many of the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of qualified candidates that are found being most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded via the respondent department just to increase favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy to the part with the respondent department.
Binding website Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and anyone seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been from the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion could possibly be regarded as, however, we've been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, matter to availability of vacancy subject matter to the approval in the competent authority.
In some jurisdictions, case law is often applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It really is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Section 489-F of your Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and coins. Its primary objective is usually to control counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity in the national currency.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded on the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )